Among other things, the LOF states:
“In reaching our finding on this Subissue, we find the following compelling:
“There is no indication in the record that Parent requested revision to Student’s transition plan . . .”
“In reaching our finding on this Subissue, we find the following compelling:
“There is no indication in the record that Parent requested revision to Student’s transition plan . . .”
The contracts provided to her today include information that should be publicly available as it details the terms of contracts for FCPS Superintendent Scott Brabrand and numerous other “leadership team” members who are responsible for the education of Fairfax County’s students and the running of its school system.
February 8, 2022, USDOE sent VDOE its response to VDOE’s corrective action information.
Special Education Action obtained the February 8, 2022, letter yesterday in response to a FOIA request submitted to VDOE.
How will USDOE defend hiring the senior official who reigned over so many years of failure?
January 27, 2022, OCR issued a letter announcing the opening of the investigation.
Retaliatory actions are the focus of the complaint.
~Judge Richard E. Gardiner
November 16, 2021, Judge Richard E. Gardiner ruled that a Fairfax County School Board’s (FCSB) lawsuit against two parents was “about as much a prior restraint as there ever could be” and he characterized one of the Board’s arguments as “almost frivolous.”
As legal fees continue to roll in, the total spent by FCSB now is expected to exceed $300,000.
The irony of the FCSB wasting $200,000+ of taxpayer funds to sue two taxpayers who dared to expose wasteful spending is impossible to ignore.
In a surprising move from a state agency averse to investigating complaints at a systemic level, VDOE ordered LCPS to “reimburse parents who have paid out of pocket for IEEs due to the unreasonable cost containment criteria,” which means the Corrective Action Plan encompasses parents who were not included in the initial complaint.